This site uses cookies, as explained in our terms of use. If you consent, please close this message and continue to use this site.
Santosh Nepal & Utsav Bhattarai
3 mins Read
Nepal is going through a phase of economic development, and consequently, a lot of water resources projects are being planned and constructed. Unfortunately, the country still takes the conventional project-by-project approach to development, which has its limitations. With a river basin approach, many sectors like hydrology, climate, ecosystem, floods and droughts, erosion and sedimentation, hydropower production, irrigation, and upstream and downstream linkages among others, are considered in totality.
The Government of Nepal explicitly states—in the Water Resources Strategy (2002), the National Water Plan (2005), and the Nepal Water Resources Policy (which is in the process of being finalized)—that proper harnessing of available water resources through a river basin management approach could increase agricultural and hydropower productivity and improve the economic status of the country.
For such an approach to work, we need solid scientific data and knowledge of the water resources in a given river basin. Current and future scenarios of the basin concerned need to be understood carefully. If the basin’s future state can be forecast to a reasonable degree of confidence, the drivers of such changes can be identified and manipulated to bring about positive changes in the development process.
In this context, an assessment of the implications on the quantity and quality of water due to current and future developments is extremely important, and this is where watershed models are crucial. A watershed model is a simplified conceptual representation of various water-related natural and anthropogenic phenomena. Examples include the hydrological cycle, which can be approximated with a hydrological model; river flow dynamics, which can be represented by a hydraulic/hydrodynamic model; groundwater systems, which can be modelled with a groundwater model; basin level planning, which can be done using a water planning model; and hydropower production and energy planning, which can be characterized by a hydropower model. Watershed models vary in their basic forms and structures, and functionalities and capabilities, depending on the availability of data and their uses.
Understanding hydrological regime, water supply and demand scenarios, and associated changes is key to the assessment of water availability to support strategic planning for a given basin’s development. Watershed modelling with a river basin approach helps collective decision making and coordination among key water sectors. The Koshi Basin Programme, an initiative at the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), conducted a study from 2012 to 2016 with the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), with the aim of arriving to such an understanding. The study was conducted in several locations on the transboundary Koshi River Basin, and was modelled using a popular hydrological model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), and a basin level planning model, Water Evaluation and Planning system (WEAP).
Results obtained from the SWAT model show that the spatial variation of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and available water within the Koshi Basin is significant. There are large temporal variations in water balance components. Results of the study depict higher precipitation and water availability in the southern part of the basin compared to the northern portion. Water is available in surplus during the monsoon with characteristic flooding in the Terai in Nepal and Bihar in India.
On the other hand, there is acute shortage of water in many parts of the basin during the dry period. Further, seasonal and inter-annual variability in water availability are expected to amplify in future climate scenarios. More than 50% of the basin is projected to see an increase in precipitation and consequently, the availability of water. The middle part of the basin (hills) is most affected while the uppermost part of the basin (mountains) is the least affected.
WEAP results also confirm that, at the annual scale, the Koshi River Basin is not a water-deficit basin. Agricultural demands rank highest, followed by domestic and industrial demands. Results further show that the construction of all 11 hydropower projects proposed by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in the mid-80’s can increase hydropower productivity and aid socio-economic development in Nepal. If these projects are operated to their fullest potential, about 30,000 Gigawatt hours of hydropower could be generated annually in the basin. This is about 17 times the total energy Nepal imported from India in the fiscal year 2015/16, and will lead to the possibility of exporting surplus energy.
A holistic river basin concept based on strong scientific data and knowledge backed up by research is necessary for the sustainable and speedy development of the water resources sector of Nepal. In this context, watershed models can be extremely useful in providing meaningful information regarding water availability, hydropower generation, supply-demand scenarios, extreme events such as floods and droughts, and collective decision making, as has been done for the Koshi River Basin.
Share
Stay up to date on what’s happening around the HKH with our most recent publications and find out how you can help by subscribing to our mailing list.
“I remember during my childhood the snow would reach up to nearly half my body, and we were unable ...
River basin management approach could increase agricultural and hydropower productivity to improve Nepal’s economic status
