This site uses cookies, as explained in our terms of use. If you consent, please close this message and continue to use this site.
Pema Gyamtsho
3 mins Read
It is hard to think of the past month without being reminded of the air pollution that engulfed us here in Kathmandu. Several factors contributed to the extremely bad air quality in Kathmandu and many parts of the HKH region in late March and early April. The prolonged dry season over the winter months had already resulted in high levels of pollution in the region, which was only made worse by the forest fires that raged across much of the mid-hills and plains of Nepal and surrounding areas.
As we monitored the forest fires using the satellite-based tool which we helped to develop and implemented by our partners, it made for a scary sight. The scale of the map made it sometimes seem like the whole of Nepal and surrounding regions were on fire. There were days when even weather/meteorology satellites confused the smoke/haze with cloud cover over our region, while air quality index readings were reaching extremely hazardous levels.
We have been fortunate to have had some much-needed rain and high winds in the past week or so, which has helped alleviate the situation. While it is now easy to forget and not think about the episode, it is important that we understand that such situations could become more frequent and common in the years ahead. This is an alarming thought, and we need to be prepared for such a future.
Other than the direct health hazards which such levels of air pollution can result in, there are also much deeper and worrying costs. Let us not forget the ecological impacts of such forest fires on our biodiversity, from the more well-known and iconic species of flora and fauna to the lesser-known insects and micro-organisms, all of which are vital for our complex but fragile ecosystems. With increased attention on zoonotic diseases in the past year, such destruction of biodiversity and habitat would only make us more vulnerable in the years to come.
Then there are the associated economic costs. Forests are extremely valuable resources not just for the wellbeing and livelihoods of many communities but also as carbon sinks in helping us fight against climate change. On the one hand, there are efforts to expand afforestation and re-forestation programmes, while on the other, we seem to be failing to conserve the forests we already have. This paradox is something which has to be addressed with appropriate forest fire disaster plans, early warning systems, and supporting technologies to ensure that the fires can be contained and extinguished quickly. Most importantly, it has to be addressed through proper messaging and campaigning to make people aware about the proper protocols and to mobilize communities when it comes to fires in forests and their peripheral areas.
Forest fires are, however, only part of the problem when it comes to air pollution in our region. While forest fires usually contribute to the deterioration of air quality, especially between the months of March and May every year, their contributions are relatively minor when viewed on an annual basis. The main sources of air pollution in our region are from the domestic (cooking, household garbage and agriculture burning), industrial, and transport sectors. To ensure that the overall, year-round air quality is at healthy levels, we must have proper monitoring and interventions to address pollution generated from these sectors as well.
It is easy to think of air pollution as a localized issue. However, we know for a fact that its impacts and implications are far reaching, literally. Black carbon and other pollutants originating in downstream regions of the HKH usually end up being deposited high up on our mountains and glaciers, exacerbating their melting. There are now studies that show that pollutants originating in our region also end up further afield in places like the Arctic, thousands of kilometres away.
These are important and significant issues which are of concern not just for our region but from a global standpoint. At ICIMOD, our Atmosphere Programme will continue to monitor and study such phenomena and work with governments and a broad network of partners to help develop practical and meaningful ground-level solutions. For the time being, let us appreciate clean air and blue skies while continuing to contemplate the bigger picture – the importance and interconnectedness of clean air for all beings.
Share
Stay up to date on what’s happening around the HKH with our most recent publications and find out how you can help by subscribing to our mailing list.
Read in english 显而易见的是,无论从事何种工作,未能克服性别不公不仅在道德上是错误的,而且对行为底线有害。 在我们迫切需要取得进展的领域,以及国际山地综合发展中心(ICIMOD)所涉及的领域,投资于女性尤为关键,包括发展、科学、气候和自然等方面。 根据世界经济论坛发布的最新研究,仅在印度,性别平等就能为国内生产总值增加7700亿美元;而在孟加拉国,这一数字将达到300亿美元。 尽管存在如此明确的经济激励,但兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区的八个国家仍然面临巨大挑战。 在ICIMOD,我们将性别平等作为2030年战略的核心组成部分,全力改变这一状况,并为国家、社区和自然环境带来回报。 在我们的运营中,我们正在充分利用我们的平台,与妇女团体、青年和原住民关系网络建立更紧密的合作关系;我们承诺通过专家团队和活动来鼓励她们发声,并为她们的职业发展和公共演讲提供支持,同时监测和解决性别不平衡的问题。 我们也致力于在招聘、晋升和行政职能方面推动公平,特别关注增强各个员工层面的性别和多样性代表性,尤其是在决策、专业和领导职位上。 性别问题现已贯穿在我们的各类项目中,每个战略小组内都设有相关专家和分析师。 目前,我们的创业工作优先考虑为由女性或主要雇佣女性以及边缘社会群体的企业提供技术支持和财务资源。 此外,考虑到地方政府和国家政府对于制定自然资源管理(NRM)计划的至关重要性,ICIMOD已经举办了培训,以支持制定能够充分利用妇女见解、技能和专业知识的NRM行动计划。 身处同一地区,我们需要更进一步。 研究表明,女性-包括妇女和女孩-首当其冲受到气候危机的影响。气候危机导致流离失所的受害者中有80%是女性。 从2025年开始,每年预计有1200万女孩受气候危机影响,无法完成学业。到2050年,将有多达1.58亿女性陷入贫困,其中2.36亿女性面临更加严重的粮食不安全状况。 这种性别不平等是由于长期存在的资金流动严重不足,以及政策针对性不够所导致的。 在国际性资金支持中,仅有0.01%用于应对气候变化和促进妇女权利的项目。 全球范围内,只要不到2%的国家气候战略考虑到了妇女和女孩的不同处境和需求。 也许,考虑到女性在决策过程中的代表性不足,这并不足为奇。 在 COP27 上,只有 6% 的世界领导人是女性,这一比例在 COP28 上上升了 10% 以上。直到今年早些时候出现强烈反对之后,今年的 COP 主席才在此前全员男性的组织委员会中增加了 ...
The past month has given me a sense of déjà vu. A number of our member countries have gone back ...
When we talk about the abundant freshwater resources of the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH), we normally think of snow- ...
山地被广泛认为是生物多样性的发源地,其陡峭的斜坡孕育了各种繁复的生命形式。这些地区作为自然的庇护所变得愈发重要:虽然它们只占据了地球总面积的四分之一,却容纳了地球上85%的两栖动物、鸟类和哺乳动物。这种丰富的自然资源在联合国教科文组织的738个全球生物圈保护区中得到体现,其中明显超过一半位于山区。 然而,令人担忧的是,这些自然资源的非凡丰富正面临威胁。过去,由于偏远或地形困难,山地得以免受人类干扰,但如今这种状况逐渐减少。曾经被视为大自然摇篮和避难所的山地正在逐渐转变成墓地。在兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区,上个世纪就已经失去了70%的生物多样性。这些损失,包括物种的灭绝,如今正以加速度增长,正如ICIMOD的重要评估报告《兴都库什喜马拉雅的水、冰、社会和生态系统》(简称《HIWISE报告》)所指出的那样。 在公众、政治和外交层面,人们越来越认识到自然是我们当前危机中最重要的解决方案之一。联合国已宣布2021-2030年为生态系统恢复十年,去年,《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的指导下,全球100多个政府承诺在2030年之前将30%的陆地和海洋保留给自然,其中包括兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区。今年,在联合国全球气候大会COP28上,自然首次成为讨论的核心议题。 这些努力,以及今年国际山岳日的“生态系统恢复”主题,为恢复和保护山区景观提供了迫切需要的推动力。那么,我们的八个成员国离实现“30x30”目标有多近呢?到目前为止,不丹是唯一一个实际超额达标的国家,其51.4%的土地面积已经属于各种保护区类别。 尼泊尔只有不到24%的土地受到保护;中国仅为16%,略高于目标的一半;巴基斯坦占12%;印度为8%;缅甸为7%;孟加拉国为5%,阿富汗为4%。 令人担忧的是,在整个兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区,自然资源仍然丰富的关键区域仍处在保护之外:67%的生态区、39%的生物多样性热点、69%的关键生物多样性区域以及76%的重要鸟类和生物多样性区都没有得到保护。 现有的保护区域犹如在人类改变过的景观中的“孤岛”,缺乏与其他保护区域的连通走廊,无法满足广泛分布的物种需求,并且面临非法捕猎、侵占和资源开采的压力。现有的保护区域不足以确保成功保护我们地区的象征性物种,包括亚洲象、独角犀牛和孟加拉虎。 一个尚未尝试的解决方案是建立跨界生物圈保护区,这将允许在景观层面进行综合保护。实现这一目标需要跨越国家边界的共同政治承诺,并在共享生态系统的管理方面展开合作。ICIMOD将积极推动我们区域成员国接受这一解决方案。 然而,底线是,要扭转自然的损失,我们必须对其进行估值并提供相应的资金支持。只要经济学家继续将其价值定为零,就不会引起足够的重视。在进行估值之前,拥有大量自然资本但经济欠发达的国家将因为缺乏3A信用评级而难以以较低贷款利率借款。必须为该地区的国家提供更便宜的资本来促使自然的恢复:这是ICIMOD将与我们的成员、多边开发银行和其他机构紧急合作推进的事项。为了防止地球系统完全崩溃,我们必须为大自然提供一个适宜的生存环境,这一观点从未像现在这样显而易见。
ICIMOD is celebrating the International Year of Biodiversity (IYB) 2010 with various activities including bringing its experience in biodiversity conservation ...
The South Asian monsoon is critical for the Hindu Kush Himalaya. It provides much needed water for our rainfed farming ...
March 14, 2025 — Today, on the International Day of Action for Rivers, let us recognise and celebrate the ...
ICIMOD staff are accounted for and are safe. Some have injuries, several have experienced severe damage to their homes, while ...