This site uses cookies, as explained in our terms of use. If you consent, please close this message and continue to use this site.
Pema Gyamtsho
3 mins Read
The South Asian monsoon is critical for the Hindu Kush Himalaya. It provides much needed water for our rainfed farming systems and recharges our hydrosphere, replenishing the blue arteries that bind our region together. We owe much to this annual weather system for our food-water-energy security, the health of our ecosystems, and the livelihoods of mountain communities.
But the monsoon also has its destructive side. Heavy rains cause floods and landslides that lead to the loss of lives and destruction of property and infrastructure every year. This year has been no different, perhaps even relatively worse than an average year.
One reason for this is that this year’s monsoon has been more intense than average. Forecasts from early in the year had predicted that our mountain regions would experience relatively wetter conditions this year compared to the average. These predictions came true, and with it also higher than average destruction and losses.
The floods and landslides in Uttarakhand and Himachal (India), Manang and Melamchi (Nepal), and Gasa (Bhutan) are but some examples of the monsoon wrath this year, which led to loss of lives, displacement, and destruction of millions of dollars’ worth of infrastructure and property. There were also two important dimensions in terms of disasters in the mountains this year which are notable. First, we saw extremely high precipitation in higher altitudes of the region; second, many of the events were multi-hazard or compound hazards in nature.
To some extent this was not surprising. Our own assessment as well as other assessments, including the recently published IPCC AR6 WG1 report, have established that climate change is likely to increase the intensity of precipitation in higher altitudes of our region. There is also growing evidence that we are highly likely to see an increase in compound or cascading hazard events where one type of hazard, say for example extreme precipitation leads to landslides which temporarily dam river channels and eventually result in devastating floods. What is surprising and painful is the fact that instead of building capabilities and preparedness for such eventualities, we as a region seem to be heading in the opposite direction with unplanned, unscientific and haphazard development which compounds the risk for mountain people and environments.
The importance and necessity of roads, hydropower plants, and other infrastructure for mountain communities is unquestionable. However, in a region which we know is highly prone to a multitude of geological and climatic hazards, any development must take into consideration such factors with proper studies and environment impact assessments (EIA) conducted prior to construction. Only by making sure such homework is done will we be able to ensure not just development, but proper development in our mountains.
From an investment perspective too, ensuring due diligence in matters like EIA prior to committing to a certain development project, would certainly allow for better decisions and significantly improve longevity and returns on that investment. For a region where mountain-specific investments and funds are relatively hard to come by, wasting precious resources on something that is not well thought out and planned would be unfortunate and unjust for mountain communities and a burden on the national economy. We cannot afford to continue with our current business-as-usual approach to mountain development.
As this year’s monsoons retreat, let us not forget the impacts and the lessons. Like many other years in the recent past, this year is a reminder that this important weather system on which we depend for water resources, and for rejuvenation and relief, can also wreak havoc when it leads to flooding or other disasters. We can do more to minimize the adverse impacts of monsoon, which is even more important as climate change impacts monsoon regimes. Let us all work together towards better preparation for the monsoon, for other extreme weather events, to avoid the worst impacts of disasters.
Share
Stay up to date on what’s happening around the HKH with our most recent publications and find out how you can help by subscribing to our mailing list.
As 2025 ends, I find myself reflecting not only on what the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) has ...
I grew up believing that mountains are eternal. Their silence felt powerful, their glaciers unshakeable. Like many across the Hindu ...
On 22 March each year, World Water Day reminds us of the important role that water plays in society and ...
ICIMOD staff are accounted for and are safe. Some have injuries, several have experienced severe damage to their homes, while ...
Breathing on Borrowed Time In the quiet hum of our cities, where life moves in a ceaseless rhythm, an invisible force ...
今年是《生物多样性公约》生效第25周年。今年“国际生物多样性 日”庆祝的主题是“生物多样性保护:行动的 25 年”。 在过去的 25 年中,兴都库什喜马拉雅地区各个国家的山区生物多样性保护工作一直受益于 《生物多样性公约》等全球环境治理机制。尽管实现《生物多样性公约》的国家和全球目标仍是 巨大的挑战,对我们来说今年的“国际生物多样性日”是一个承前启后、继往开来的时刻。 兴都库什喜马拉雅地区是 2.4 亿人口的家园,并为占世界四分之一人口的 19 亿人提供水资 源。位于该地区的喜马拉雅、印缅、中国西南山区以及中亚山区历来就是紧密联系的跨境生物多 样性热点地区。这些热点地区为 30 亿人口的生计提供支持并保障他们的粮食安全,而这 30 亿人 口中包含了部分世界上最贫困及弱势的人群。 尊重兴都库什喜马拉雅地区生命的多样性及着眼于人民的福祉一直以来作为核心理念主导着 国际山地综合发展中心的工作,中心跨境景观保护与发展项目的各项行动就是最好的证明。通过 ...
山地被广泛认为是生物多样性的发源地,其陡峭的斜坡孕育了各种繁复的生命形式。这些地区作为自然的庇护所变得愈发重要:虽然它们只占据了地球总面积的四分之一,却容纳了地球上85%的两栖动物、鸟类和哺乳动物。这种丰富的自然资源在联合国教科文组织的738个全球生物圈保护区中得到体现,其中明显超过一半位于山区。 然而,令人担忧的是,这些自然资源的非凡丰富正面临威胁。过去,由于偏远或地形困难,山地得以免受人类干扰,但如今这种状况逐渐减少。曾经被视为大自然摇篮和避难所的山地正在逐渐转变成墓地。在兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区,上个世纪就已经失去了70%的生物多样性。这些损失,包括物种的灭绝,如今正以加速度增长,正如ICIMOD的重要评估报告《兴都库什喜马拉雅的水、冰、社会和生态系统》(简称《HIWISE报告》)所指出的那样。 在公众、政治和外交层面,人们越来越认识到自然是我们当前危机中最重要的解决方案之一。联合国已宣布2021-2030年为生态系统恢复十年,去年,《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的指导下,全球100多个政府承诺在2030年之前将30%的陆地和海洋保留给自然,其中包括兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区。今年,在联合国全球气候大会COP28上,自然首次成为讨论的核心议题。 这些努力,以及今年国际山岳日的“生态系统恢复”主题,为恢复和保护山区景观提供了迫切需要的推动力。那么,我们的八个成员国离实现“30x30”目标有多近呢?到目前为止,不丹是唯一一个实际超额达标的国家,其51.4%的土地面积已经属于各种保护区类别。 尼泊尔只有不到24%的土地受到保护;中国仅为16%,略高于目标的一半;巴基斯坦占12%;印度为8%;缅甸为7%;孟加拉国为5%,阿富汗为4%。 令人担忧的是,在整个兴都库什-喜马拉雅地区,自然资源仍然丰富的关键区域仍处在保护之外:67%的生态区、39%的生物多样性热点、69%的关键生物多样性区域以及76%的重要鸟类和生物多样性区都没有得到保护。 现有的保护区域犹如在人类改变过的景观中的“孤岛”,缺乏与其他保护区域的连通走廊,无法满足广泛分布的物种需求,并且面临非法捕猎、侵占和资源开采的压力。现有的保护区域不足以确保成功保护我们地区的象征性物种,包括亚洲象、独角犀牛和孟加拉虎。 一个尚未尝试的解决方案是建立跨界生物圈保护区,这将允许在景观层面进行综合保护。实现这一目标需要跨越国家边界的共同政治承诺,并在共享生态系统的管理方面展开合作。ICIMOD将积极推动我们区域成员国接受这一解决方案。 然而,底线是,要扭转自然的损失,我们必须对其进行估值并提供相应的资金支持。只要经济学家继续将其价值定为零,就不会引起足够的重视。在进行估值之前,拥有大量自然资本但经济欠发达的国家将因为缺乏3A信用评级而难以以较低贷款利率借款。必须为该地区的国家提供更便宜的资本来促使自然的恢复:这是ICIMOD将与我们的成员、多边开发银行和其他机构紧急合作推进的事项。为了防止地球系统完全崩溃,我们必须为大自然提供一个适宜的生存环境,这一观点从未像现在这样显而易见。
Forests cover close to one-third of the earth’s land surface and contain more than two-thirds of the world’s terrestrial species. ...