This site uses cookies, as explained in our terms of use. If you consent, please close this message and continue to use this site.
Binaya Pasakhala
3 mins Read
The German writer and statesman Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do”. My visit to Darchula in Nepal’s far west in late 2016 reminded me of the poignancy of this statement.
In 2015, the Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation and Development Initiative (KSLCDI) supported the Api Nampa Conservation Area (ANCA) Office in Darchula form a management council. The objective was to empower local communities to carry out conservation and development activities. Twenty-five local representatives (two female and 23 male) were elected from 25 village development committees within the conservation area. As suggested by these figures, the council was not a gender responsive or inclusive one. KSLCDI’s continuous engagement with the council in 2015 and 2016 also revealed this. Therefore, KSLCDI organized a workshop for the management council members in September 2016 to sensitize them on gender and social issues.
On the first day of the two-day workshop, the participants had to define gender and governance. One of them, Pulendra Bahadur Karki, defined gender as ‘discrimination based on sex, caste, and religion’ and governance as ‘managing an organization in an accountable, transparent, responsive, and inclusive manner’. Although he wasn’t right about gender, it seemed to me that Pulendra understood that men and women held different statuses in society by virtue of them being male and female. He was also right in associating gender with discrimination. And his definition of governance seemed to stem from a very clear idea of what it takes to successfully run an organization.
Despite definitions similar to the ones given by Pulendra, though, I was somewhat doubtful of the participants’ actual understanding of gender and governance. It was impossible to ignore the fact that only two out of 25 members were women. I was therefore skeptical, but highly interested in the council members’ getting a better understanding of the idea and practice of gender and governance.
During the workshop, the participants were engaged in group activities and discussions on various gender and governance issues the council faces on a regular basis. However, here I shall only share an experience from a puzzle game developed for sensitizing communities at the local level on gender discrimination in the decision making process. For the game, workshop participants were divided into four groups of five or six members. Each group was provided a puzzle to put together, but one piece was intentionally missing. This piece was secretly handed over to a pre-selected group member who was instructed not to disclose this ‘missing’ piece unless asked for by other group members.
The sole female workshop participant, Chandrawati Karki, was also one of the people chosen to ‘hide’ the missing puzzle piece. Not surprisingly, hers was the last group to complete the puzzle because her group members never sought her opinion. We had to constantly prod the group to engage ‘all’ group members in the activity. Sadly, Chandrawati said that this is exactly what happens during council meetings. Though she quite regularly attends management council meetings, her views and concerns are never sought, nor are they reflected in the decisions made or records kept. She was very happy with the puzzle exercise because it clearly revealed that the council will meet the same fate as her group, if they continue to ignore women.
The participants said that the workshop made them realize their shortcomings and pledged to incorporate lessons learnt from the workshop into the council’s constitutional and operational plan. The take-away message from the workshop for someone like me who aspires to bridge the gap between researchers and practitioners was that having theoretical knowledge on gender and governance and putting them into practice are two different things altogether. Continuous engagement with communities is necessary to bring about positive behavioral change.
Share
Stay up to date on what’s happening around the HKH with our most recent publications and find out how you can help by subscribing to our mailing list.
Related Content
Training sessions were conducted in three different locations over the course of three days where 110 villagers, fifty percent of ...
ICIMOD Knowledge Park provided 3 days hands on training to farmers and District Agriculture Office staff from Argakhanchi district which ...
Pollination is a vital ecosystem service that is essential for ensuring human food security as well as maintaining natural ecosystems. ...
Bishnu Prasad Ghimire, a vegetable farmer from Triyuga, a municipality in Nepal’s Udayapur district, recalls how up until a few ...
The growing size of the human population in this transboundary area has increased demand for agricultural land, fuel and infrastructure ...
Par Siam Lusai from Bethel para, the only women participant of the 2017 training, has also found success with beekeeping. ...
Pilot project activities focusing on rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems implemented by the Support to Rural Livelihoods and Climate Change Adaptation ...
Tourism is booming in Pulan County. The traditional landscape of yak herders and agriculturalists in the southwest corner of the ...