This site uses cookies, as explained in our terms of use. If you consent, please close this message and continue to use this site.
2 mins Read
Glaciers in the upper Indus supply more than half of the river water and are experiencing significant melting. There is much discussion on the recent melting rate, which involves considerable uncertainties. A recent study reported one of these uncertainties to be caused by density assumptions for volume-to-mass change conversion, hindering estimations of precise glacier mass change.
The majority of previous studies used constant densities for volume-to-mass change estimations. The average density assumption for volume-to-mass conversion represents a potential source of error and has substantial variability in geodetic mass balance measurements. The density assumption must be used with caution as it depends on several factors, including the magnitude of elevation changes, in addition to the terrain (as our study considered). A constant density of 850 ± 60 kg/m3 in a more extended period (>3 years as suggested by Huss (2013)) may not be useful for glaciers with significant positive thickness change. Our study presents the sensitivity of ice density assumptions for volume-to-mass change conversion in the Indus basin. We used four different criteria for converting ice loss into water equivalent with different combinations of slope (below and above 20° and 25°) with ice densities of 600, 800, 850, and 900 kg/m3.
The bias caused by the average density assumption of 850 kg/m3 varied between −0.20 and +0.09 m w.e.a-1 throughout the Indus basin. The bias comes mainly from the thickness change and glacier cover above 20° and 25° slopes where 600 kg/m3 density was assumed. The glacier cover area above slopes of 25° is approximately more than 40% of the whole glacierized region, but the bias is more concentrated in the Karakoram and adjacent region, where the magnitude of thickness change of glacier ice above 25° is higher. We also found a contrasting pattern between the east and west of the Karakoram glaciers with significant bias. The bias in the Hindu Kush and Himalaya is comparable. Overall, the bias due to the constant density assumption results in a reduction of the imbalance by 35%.
At the Indus basin scale, the mass balance is extremely negative in the northwest of the southern sub-basins. The glacier mass balance in the south of the Himalaya, including the Chenab, Jhelum, and Ravi sub-basins, is noticeably negative, compared with the other sub-basins. However, the losses in these sub-basins, excluding the Chenab, only exert a small effect on the river flows because of the small glacial coverage. The negative mass balance during the study period contributed approximately +0.014 ± 0.016 mm/a1 to global sea-level equivalent. This imbalance is equivalent to one-third of the contribution by all the glaciers in the High Mountain Asia (HMA) estimated during 2000–2016 by Brun et al. (2017), while covering one-fourth of the total glacierized area. These results suggest that declining mass in the Indus basin is as important as that in the rest of the HMA.
Our study shows that the glacier mass losses are mostly from the Himalaya and the Hindu Kush regions in the Indus basin. Future changes in the climate will affect glaciers and downstream river flows, and the 21st-century projections of these changes are extremely uncertain. It is therefore crucial to collect more data, including accurate glacier ice density for volume to mass conversion, to understand the mass imbalance better in the future.
Additional information
Link to the full published article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.057
Citation for the full article: Muhammad, S., Tian, L., & Khan, A. (2019). Early twenty-first century glacier mass losses in the Indus Basin constrained by density assumptions. Journal of Hydrology, 574:467–475.
Share
Stay up to date on what’s happening around the HKH with our most recent publications and find out how you can help by subscribing to our mailing list.
RELATED CONTENTS
The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development’s (ICIMOD) Rural Livelihoods and Climate Change Adaptation in the Himalayas (Himalica) Programme, in ...
Why monitor glacial lakes? Of the 3,624 glacial lakes in the Koshi, Karnali, and Gandaki basins, our
'There is commercial value to each and every thing if you have an eye for it', said Chief Executive Officer ...
Water is the lifeblood of every household in Nepal's middle hills, but accessing it is a challenge. Hill hamlets depend ...
The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) organised a multi-stakeholder consultation meeting in collaboration with the Khagrachari Hill Development Council ...
Nirakar Thapa, a hydrologist at DHM and Niraj Shankar Pradhananga, an assistant meteorologist at the department, processed and analyzed field ...
Vote for ICIMOD's entry for Best Climate Practices Award ICIMOD and CEAPRED’s Climate Smart Villages, a pilot across four villages in Kavrepalanchowk in ...
Scientists struggle with research challenges as they endeavour to improve our understanding of rapid changes in the environment and their ...